Internet Disruptions in Nepal: Government Actions and Public Backlash

Nepal’s Internet users have faced significant connectivity issues following a directive from the Ministry for Communication and Information Technology. The mandate, issued to the Nepal Telecommunication Authority last week, called for the deactivation of unregistered social media platforms under the Social Media Directives 2080. This directive set a midnight deadline on September 4, triggering disruptions in access to popular platforms such as Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp, and YouTube.

Why Did the Government Issue the Directive?

The Nepalese government stated that the directive aimed to curb the spread of misinformation, fraud, and hate speech online. A total of 26 services, including global giants like Facebook and Reddit, were required to register under new guidelines. The motive behind this move was to ensure greater accountability and compliance within the country’s regulatory framework. However, critics argue that such measures jeopardize internet freedom and pave the way for potential misuse of power, raising serious questions about censorship and governmental overreach.

Public Backlash and Protests in Kathmandu

Public reaction to the internet restrictions has been swift and vocal. On September 8, protestors gathered in Kathmandu to express their frustration over internet bans as well as growing dissatisfaction with the government’s handling of the economy and allegations of corruption. These demonstrations placed pressure on the Ministry, leading to a reversal of the directive the very next day on September 9. Despite this official rollback, local reports indicate that internet connectivity remains inconsistent, with platforms like Google experiencing a notable drop in traffic, as well as disruptions confirmed by data monitoring sources like IODA and Cloudflare Radar.

Wide-Ranging Impacts of Internet Shutdowns

Internet shutdowns have serious repercussions on multiple fronts. From disrupting communication and online services to harming the local economy, the ripple effects are profound. Businesses reliant on digital platforms face losses, while users lose access to essential services such as online government portals. Even Nepal’s global reputation is at stake, as repeated disruptions can lead to a perception of instability, deterring foreign investment and partnerships. Policymakers need to carefully weigh the impact of such measures on human rights and economic stability before implementing them.

What’s the Way Forward?

To effectively manage the challenges posed by misinformation and online threats, governments must strike a balance between security and internet freedom. Transparent policies, public dialogue, and technological solutions such as enhanced content moderation can help address concerns without resorting to drastic measures like mass internet restrictions. For Nepal, restoring public trust and ensuring seamless connectivity should be a priority to safeguard both digital rights and economic progress.